Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept
From: Jeremy Hall (jhall@UU.NET )
Date: Thu Jan 13 2000 - 09:22:42 EET

possibly, however removing the enm effect from the equasion still makes
efr and efb do different things. I cannot explain it other than it just
sounds different.

_J

In the new year, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Jeremy Hall wrote:
>
> > ecasound -a:1,2 -i /tmp/in.raw -o /tmp/out.raw -a:1 -efr:4120,8000 -ea:386
> > -a:2 -efb:4120,8000 -enm:7,75,50,0,1
> [...]
> > except something doesn't feel right. these options with ecasound6
> > and ecasound5 do not yield the same results. why is this? :(
>
> Remember that -enm was rewritten in 1.6.10d10 ... that's probably it.
>
> --
> Kai Vehmanen <kaiv@wakkanet.fi> -------- CS, University of Turku, Finland
> . http://www.wakkanet.fi/ecasound/ - linux audio processing
> . http://www.wakkanet.fi/sculpscape/ - ambient-idm-rock-... mp3/ra/wav
>
>

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Thu Jan 13 2000 - 09:23:32 EET