Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

Subject: Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept
From: Kai Vehmanen (kaiv@wakkanet.fi)
Date: Thu Jan 13 2000 - 15:08:02 EET

Next message: Jeremy Hall: "Re: [ecasound] I think this has been asked before ... but ..."
Previous message: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] I think this has been asked before ... but ..."
In reply to: Jeremy Hall: "Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept"
Reply: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept"
Reply: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept"

On Thu, 13 Jan 2000, Jeremy Hall wrote:

>>> ecasound -a:1,2 -i /tmp/in.raw -o /tmp/out.raw -a:1 -efr:4120,8000 -ea:386
>>> -a:2 -efb:4120,8000 -enm:7,75,50,0,1
> possibly, however removing the enm effect from the equasion still makes
> efr and efb do different things. I cannot explain it other than it just

One possibility is signal limiting. In older versions limititing was
done separately for each channel. In 1.6.9r9 and newer, limiting is
done during output mixing.

-- 
Kai Vehmanen <kaiv@wakkanet.fi> -------- CS, University of Turku, Finland
 . http://www.wakkanet.fi/ecasound/ - linux audio processing
 . http://www.wakkanet.fi/sculpscape/ - ambient-idm-rock-... mp3/ra/wav

Next message: Jeremy Hall: "Re: [ecasound] I think this has been asked before ... but ..."
Previous message: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] I think this has been asked before ... but ..."
In reply to: Jeremy Hall: "Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept"
Reply: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept"
Reply: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept"

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Fri Jan 14 2000 - 13:55:09 EET