Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

Subject: Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept
From: Kai Vehmanen (kaiv@wakkanet.fi)
Date: Wed Jan 12 2000 - 12:19:01 EET

Next message: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] cs-edit might be broken"
Previous message: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] what is wrong with this?"
In reply to: Jeremy Hall: "[ecasound] an interesting concept"
Next in thread: Jeremy Hall: "Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept"
Reply: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept"
Reply: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept"

On Mon, 10 Jan 2000, Jeremy Hall wrote:

> ecasound -a:1,2 -i /tmp/in.raw -o /tmp/out.raw -a:1 -efr:4120,8000 -ea:386
> -a:2 -efb:4120,8000 -enm:7,75,50,0,1
[...]
> except something doesn't feel right. these options with ecasound6
> and ecasound5 do not yield the same results. why is this? :(

Remember that -enm was rewritten in 1.6.10d10 ... that's probably it.

-- 
Kai Vehmanen <kaiv@wakkanet.fi> -------- CS, University of Turku, Finland
 . http://www.wakkanet.fi/ecasound/ - linux audio processing
 . http://www.wakkanet.fi/sculpscape/ - ambient-idm-rock-... mp3/ra/wav

Next message: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] cs-edit might be broken"
Previous message: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] what is wrong with this?"
In reply to: Jeremy Hall: "[ecasound] an interesting concept"
Next in thread: Jeremy Hall: "Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept"
Reply: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept"
Reply: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] an interesting concept"

New Message	Reply	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Wed Jan 12 2000 - 16:33:10 EET