Subject: Re: [ecasound] buffering question
From: janne halttunen (jhalttun_AT_pp.htv.fi)
Date: Fri Dec 27 2002 - 11:40:32 EET
On Thu, 26 Dec 2002 18:24:49 +0000
The Eye <the.eye_AT_gmx.li> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 25, 2002 at 05:16:19PM +0100, smoerk wrote:
> > but for your application it's better to use big buffer sizes to avoid
> > any drop outs.
> >
> so I thought 1024 samples is much less, and I was gonna try a little bit
> more, say maybe 10240 samples .. but what I get is the following:
This was the power of 2 thingie. So you have 64, 128, 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 4096, 8192, 16384, 32768 .. and so on, which you can pass to ecasound as buffer-size values.
janne
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Dec 27 2002 - 11:37:50 EET