Re: [ecasound] "-ev" vs. ecasignalview

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

Subject: Re: [ecasound] "-ev" vs. ecasignalview
From: janne halttunen (jhalttun_AT_pp.htv.fi)
Date: Fri Oct 25 2002 - 01:31:26 EEST

Next message: raoul.megelas: "a stupid test!"
Previous message: Craig Meyer: "Multiple stereo records at once"
In reply to: Adam Linson: "Re: [ecasound] "-ev" vs. ecasignalview"
Next in thread: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] "-ev" vs. ecasignalview"
Next in thread: janne halttunen: "Re: [ecasound] Effects problems and feedback"
Reply: janne halttunen: "Re: [ecasound] "-ev" vs. ecasignalview"

On 24 Oct 2002 14:31:47 +0200
Adam Linson <adam_AT_dooyoo.de> wrote:

> as for a guess to what eca stands for, all i could come up with before i
> asked was either "Ephedrine-Caffeine-Aspirin" (sounds like a potential
> programming recipe), "Electronics Corporation of America" (they did make
> tube radios), or "Evangelical Christian Association" (highly unlikely).

how about "Ethereal Contemplative Athmosphere" :)

janne

p.s. wwwe are no longer knights who say ni. we are knights who say eci-eci-eci-eci-ta-pan!

Next message: raoul.megelas: "a stupid test!"
Previous message: Craig Meyer: "Multiple stereo records at once"
In reply to: Adam Linson: "Re: [ecasound] "-ev" vs. ecasignalview"
Next in thread: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] "-ev" vs. ecasignalview"
Next in thread: janne halttunen: "Re: [ecasound] Effects problems and feedback"
Reply: janne halttunen: "Re: [ecasound] "-ev" vs. ecasignalview"

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Oct 25 2002 - 01:37:06 EEST