[ecasound] stability of the 2.1devX series

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: [ecasound] stability of the 2.1devX series
From: Kai Vehmanen (k_AT_eca.cx)
Date: Tue Sep 17 2002 - 22:05:39 EEST

Hello again,

2.1devX has been in development since August of 2001. Now I'm facing the
same old problem: is 2.1dev11 stable enough, and if not, what needs to be
done befofe 2.2.0?

So I'd like to hear from you who are using 2.1devX releases or the current
CVS-tree. Are there any critical bugs or missing features that you have
noted? Positive reports (ie. "I'm using 2.1devX regularly for X and it's
working fine") are also very welcome.

My own list of items is as follows:

   - resample io-type (edi-24; even if using the old resampling code)
       - partially implemented, needs testing
       - audioio-resample.{h,cpp}
   - bugs in the reverse io-type
   - basic documentation of ecasignalview to user's guide
       - the new user-interface is quite nice :)
   - determinate and document what is the "official" way to do
     multitrack-recording on ecasound (to user's guide)
       - ie. whether to write bash scripts or write chainsetup
         files
       - a complete example of an recording&mixing session would
         be very nice!
   - implement a neteci monitor client (but _not_ the neteci (RPC-)API)
   - more basic documentation of ecasound (the ui) to user's guide
   - API-issue: output_samples() -> max_output_samples()?

So nothing really serious on this list. 

-- 
 http://www.eca.cx
 Audio software for Linux!

--
To unsubscribe send message 'unsubscribe' in the body of the
message to <ecasound-list-request_AT_wakkanet.fi>.

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Sep 17 2002 - 22:06:47 EEST