Subject: Re: [ecasound] fades
From: Jeremy Hall (jhall_AT_uu.net)
Date: Tue Apr 23 2002 - 18:03:03 EEST
I'll take a look. I'll use the newer formulas we didn't end up using
because of they were discovered after writing the code.
_J
In the new year, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2002, Jeremy Hall wrote:
>
> > We need logarythmic fades, not linear fades with kl and kl2. That just
> > SUCKS!
>
> True, log fades would be extremely useful, although I think we need
> the linear fades as well.
>
> > If you need the formulas, we chatted about them on ardour-dev a few months
> > ago.
>
> Implementation should be quite straightforward. You should start from
> ecasound/libecasound/linear-envelope.cpp (log-envelope.cpp), and just
> rewrite the value() member function. Similarly with the two-stage
> envelope.
>
> I don't have time to do this now, but if someone has the time and energy,
> just go ahead. I can help integrating the new fades. Anyways, I'll make
> this an edi-item so it's not forgotten:
>
> (edi-26): Logarithmic linear envelopes
> - submitted: jhall, 23.04.2002
>
> --
> http://www.eca.cx
> Audio software for Linux!
>
> --
> To unsubscribe send message 'unsubscribe' in the body of the
> message to <ecasound-list-request_AT_wakkanet.fi>.
>
-- To unsubscribe send message 'unsubscribe' in the body of the message to <ecasound-list-request_AT_wakkanet.fi>.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Tue Apr 23 2002 - 17:50:23 EEST