Re: [ecasound] First big multitrack project

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [ecasound] First big multitrack project
From: S. Massy (theanaloguekid@tak.net.dhis.org)
Date: Fri Jul 27 2001 - 19:35:12 EEST

On Fri, 27 Jul 2001, Junichi Uekawa <dancer@netfort.gr.jp> wrote:

> Also, my experience suggests that Alsa 0.9 series seems to be
> worse than Alsa 0.5 series in terms of latency...
> But my experience might be wrong.
It's weird because you're not the first person I hear stating this about
ALSA 0.9, yet my personal experience is the total opposite; I had a lot of
problems with 0.5.x and 0.9.0Bx is much more reliable for me, I wonder why
it's so different from person to person...
>
>
> regards,
> junichi
>
>
> --
> dancer@debian.org http://www.netfort.gr.jp/~dancer
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe send message 'unsubscribe' in the body of the
> message to <ecasound-list-request@wakkanet.fi>.
> 

--
To unsubscribe send message 'unsubscribe' in the body of the
message to <ecasound-list-request@wakkanet.fi>.

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri Jul 27 2001 - 19:34:23 EEST