Re: [ecasound] interesting and relevant(?) link

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [ecasound] interesting and relevant(?) link
From: Kimmo Koli (kimmo@ecdl.hut.fi)
Date: Tue Mar 14 2000 - 23:47:35 EET

On Tue, 14 Mar 2000 brad@worldofbeverage.net wrote:

> here is a technical comparison of several mp3 encoders
>
> http://arstechnica.com/wankerdesk/1q00/mp3/mp3-3.html
>
Interesting indeed. So with what bitrate ecasound in using in
mp3-output. I just broke my motherboard and the new one has a 512kB cache
while the old had 1024kB. This lead to over 90% processor time for lame
in my 350MHz AMD K6/2 while with the old board with the bigger cache lame
took less than 80%. I guess that compressing to 256k bitrate would be
easier for the processor that 128k bitrate. And as we know now the sound
quality would be much better then.

Best regards,
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
   Kimmo Koli Helsinki University of Technology
   kimmo@ecdl.hut.fi Electronic Circuit Design Laboratory
   http://www.ecdl.hut.fi/~kimmo P.O.Box 3000
   Tel: +358 9 451 2273 FIN-02015 HUT
   Fax: +358 9 451 2269 Finland
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= 

--
To unsubscribe send message 'unsubscribe' in the body of the
message to <ecasound-list-request@wakkanet.fi>.

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Tue Mar 14 2000 - 23:51:49 EET