Subject: Re: [ecasound] Timer controlled recording
From: Kimmo Koli (kimmo@ecdl.hut.fi)
Date: Thu Mar 02 2000 - 10:19:33 EET
On Wed, 1 Mar 2000, Jeremy Hall wrote:
> and if you have a fast enough cpu, you can use lame to real-time encode
> the data. That does marvelous things to reduce the amount of disk space
> needed.
>
Yes, I've tried it already. Now I can listen to my favourite radio
programs when I have time to do it. Wish I had a less noisy computer,
though...
Anyway, I'm just wondering how much overhead I have left when I'm
recording and encoding 44.1kHz stereo on the fly on a K6/2 running at
350MHz. XLoad seems to be fixed to one but that may not mean that I'm
using all computing resources yet. Load may be high for just for
"active" waiting.
Best regards, Kimmo
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Kimmo Koli Helsinki University of Technology
kimmo@ecdl.hut.fi Electronic Circuit Design Laboratory
http://www.ecdl.hut.fi/~kimmo P.O.Box 3000
Tel: +358 9 451 2273 FIN-02015 HUT
Fax: +358 9 451 2269 Finland
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Thu Mar 02 2000 - 10:20:37 EET