On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 07:25:45PM +0300, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, S. Massy wrote:
>
> >"'mix-%' determines how much effected (wet) signal is mixed to the
> >original." But in fact should read something like this: "'mix-%'
> >expresses the mix balance between the original and delayed signal, with
> >0 meaning no delayed signal, 100 meaning no original signal, and 50 (the
> >default) achieving an equal balance."
>
> thanks, that's indeed better. I took the liberty of making a commit
> out of this, in your name, and committed to git master. In general
> I'd welcome patches to the man pages and other documentation. Some
> of the bits are written in haste, after long hacking sessions
> (having to quickly update the docs before commit), and are in need
> of polish, clarifications and/or fixes.
No problem; I'll be glad to submit patches/corrections as I find
discrepancies or mistakes.
>
> Btw, the mix-% interpretation dates back from guitar fx gear where
> you usually had a single dial/control for "reverb mix" and it works
> like the one in ecasound.
May I suggest renaming mix-% to mix-balance-% or wet/dry-% or something
of the kind?
Cheers,
S.M.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
For Developers, A Lot Can Happen In A Second.
Boundary is the first to Know...and Tell You.
Monitor Your Applications in Ultra-Fine Resolution. Try it FREE!
http://p.sf.net/sfu/Boundary-d2dvs2
_______________________________________________
Ecasound-list mailing list
Ecasound-list@email-addr-hidden
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecasound-list
Received on Mon Apr 23 00:15:01 2012
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Mon Apr 23 2012 - 00:15:02 EEST