Re: Question about Interfaces

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: Question about Interfaces
From: Jim Ramsay (i.am_AT_jimramsay.com)
Date: Mon Oct 06 2003 - 07:24:24 EEST

Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> On Fri, 3 Oct 2003, Jim Ramsay wrote:
>
>
>>I am curious why the "object oriented" interfaces to ecasound (like the
>>C++ and python ones) do not provide a more object-oriented idiom for
>>accessing chains, inputs, outputs, effects, etc?
>
>
> They are easier to maintain. It's also possibly to use the interfaces
> provided by libecasound [1], but this is no longer encouraged. The
> following mail explains some of the history and reasons for concentrating
> on the simpler ECI interfaces:
>
> http://eca.cx/ecasound-list/2002/10/0031.html

Thanks, this answered a lot of questions! I guess I'll stick to ECI
after all... it's not all bad, just a little more string parsing than
I'm used to. :) 

-- 
Jim Ramsay
i.am_AT_jimramsay.com                         PGP Key ID: 0xBE28F488

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Mon Oct 06 2003 - 07:23:07 EEST