Re: [ecasound] -t: at 48000

Subject: Re: [ecasound] -t: at 48000
From: Kai Vehmanen (k_AT_eca.cx)
Date: Wed May 14 2003 - 01:49:02 EEST

• Next message: Tobie Kerridge: "record sound-in os x"
• Previous message: Jeremy Hall: "-t: at 48000"
• In reply to: Jeremy Hall: "-t: at 48000"
• Next in thread: Jeremy Hall: "Re: [ecasound] -t: at 48000"
• Reply: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] -t: at 48000"

On Tue, 13 May 2003, Jeremy Hall wrote:

> my aio-objects were at 48 instead of 44.1. ecasound stopped short and I'm
> wondering if it is because it didn't use the right rate when computing
> frames_per_second for the -t parameter.

The samplerate shouldn't have any effect to how -t:x works, so either it's
a bug or ...

-- 
 http://www.eca.cx
 Audio software for Linux!

• Next message: Tobie Kerridge: "record sound-in os x"
• Previous message: Jeremy Hall: "-t: at 48000"
• In reply to: Jeremy Hall: "-t: at 48000"
• Next in thread: Jeremy Hall: "Re: [ecasound] -t: at 48000"
• Reply: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] -t: at 48000"

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Wed May 14 2003 - 01:50:57 EEST