Re: [ecasound] Re: ecasound latency (fwd)

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [ecasound] Re: ecasound latency (fwd)
From: Kai Vehmanen (kaiv@wakkanet.fi)
Date: Sat Jan 22 2000 - 15:31:45 EET

On Fri, 21 Jan 2000, Jeremy Hall wrote:

>> for multiple chains. If there are no realtime device in the
>> chainsetup, only then the number of tracks starts to slow things down.
> oh that's bril. so I have to use rtnull so that all my tracks are synched?

Well, not necessarily. You need to use rtnull to ensure realtime processing
speed. If you have no realtime devices, ecasound processes as fast as
it can, but individual chains will stay synced. 

-- 
Kai Vehmanen <kaiv@wakkanet.fi> -------- CS, University of Turku, Finland
 . http://www.wakkanet.fi/ecasound/ - linux multitrack audio processing
 . http://www.wakkanet.fi/sculpscape/ - ambient-idm-rock-... mp3/ra/wav

New Message Reply Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Sat Jan 22 2000 - 18:13:09 EET