Subject: Re: [ecasound] Re: ecasound latency (fwd)
From: Jeremy Hall (jhall@UU.NET )
Date: Thu Jan 20 2000 - 14:35:20 EET
but 2.9 multiplied by 8 or 16 yields 23.2 or 46.44. This is NOT
acceptable when you're trying to run 8 or 16 tracks.
_J
In the new year, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> > I've tried ecasound for realtime effectprocessing, but even when I only
> > record and directly play a sound, ecasound has some latency. My CPU has
> > nothing to do. Do you know what I can do, to make sure I've a very small
>
> Latency depends on buffersize (-b:samples). By default, a buffer of
> 1024 samples is used. With sampling rate of 44100samples/seconds, this
> results in 23msec latency (+sound card buffering). This is definitely
> too much. For my own realtime processing needs, I usually use -b:64
> (~1.5ms) or -b:128 (~2.9ms). These are almost inaudible.
>
> --
> Kai Vehmanen <kaiv@wakkanet.fi> -------- CS, University of Turku, Finland
> . http://www.wakkanet.fi/ecasound/ - linux multitrack audio processing
> . http://www.wakkanet.fi/sculpscape/ - ambient-idm-rock-... mp3/ra/wav
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2a24 : Thu Jan 20 2000 - 14:36:10 EET