Hi,
On Sun, 30 Aug 2009, Joel Roth wrote:
> Ardour was designed from the ground up to enable bypass.
> I believe Paul Davis considered and rejected using Ecasound
> as the audio processing engine for Ardour because of some
> of these issues.
just as a small correction -- I'm pretty sure Paul never considered
Ecasound code for Ardour. The two were developed basicly at the same time
and Paul had a fairly big codebase already from Quasimodo and Softwerk.
And most importantly, the design goals were quite different .. Ardour
targetted for full DAW functionality from the start, while Ecasound had a
much more narrow scope.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
Ecasound-list mailing list
Ecasound-list@email-addr-hidden
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecasound-list
Received on Tue Sep 1 00:15:02 2009
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 00:15:03 EEST