Hi,
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008, Oliver Oli wrote:
>> Here is some simple chainsetup, jack shows a cpu load around 7%
[...]
>> it seems that the loop device consumes quite some cpu and I wonder if
>> that is to be expected, a bug or me not understanding ecasound?
[...]
> I have to add that this was related to running ecasound on OS X. I
> tested the chainsetup on Linux and there is no difference with or
> without the loop device.
now that's just crazy in fact. Does the same happen without JACK (you can
simulate real-time operation somewhat by replacing "jack_auto" with
"rtnull" and checking the CPU usage with 'top' or something similar)...?
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ecasound-list mailing list Ecasound-list@email-addr-hidden https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecasound-listReceived on Tue Sep 2 00:15:03 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Tue Sep 02 2008 - 00:15:03 EEST