Hi,
On Fri, 15 Aug 2008, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
> Is there the same kind of lazy coding in the latest prerelease version ?
yes, there are no changes to the loop device code. But of course, as
audioloop device _is_ supported, you don't get this weird result.
> Command line parsing should really be flawless, otherwise there is no
> way for end user to understand where his/her mistake is.
Patches are welcome.
I do agree with you -- we've been improving the parsing a lot during the
whole 2.4.x series (ecasound can now identify many common errors and
report them), but it's not perfect.
-- ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ Ecasound-list mailing list Ecasound-list@email-addr-hidden https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecasound-listReceived on Sat Aug 16 16:15:02 2008
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sat Aug 16 2008 - 16:15:02 EEST