Kai Vehmanen wrote:
> On Fri, 8 Apr 2005, Kai Vehmanen wrote:
>
>> This is ok to me. As mentioned some time ago on this list (then
>> related to Ecasound's Debian packages), my recommendation is to
>> disable aRts support in the distribution packages of Ecasound at this
>> point.
>
>
> And more reasons for dropping aRts-support: it seems that recent
> versions of libartsc bring dependencies to libglib, libgmodule,
> libgthread, ... which are not otherwise used by ecasound. So dropping
> aRts will get rid of four library dependencies...
>
I have disabled aRts support starting with the 2.4.0 gentoo ebuild
script, because
it would have forced to emerge KDE. I didn't fancy that, so I just took
it out.
Does onyone use aRts support anyways ? If not, I have no trouble
dropping it.
Kamil
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Ecasound-list mailing list
Ecasound-list@email-addr-hidden
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecasound-list
Received on Sun Apr 10 16:15:05 2005
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.8 : Sun Apr 10 2005 - 16:15:05 EEST