Re: [ecasound] Using Ladspa surround encoder?

New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

Subject: Re: [ecasound] Using Ladspa surround encoder?
From: Greg Lee (greg_AT_ling.lll.hawaii.edu)
Date: Fri May 28 2004 - 15:29:28 EEST


Eric Dantan Rzewnicki wrote:
...
>
> I'm not familiar with the surroundEncoder plugin, but you may need to
> check out -erc in man ecasound. with this you can route the channels
> like so:
>
> ecasound -d -f:16,2,22050 \
> -a:1 -f:s32_le,1,22050 -i amb1.wav -ea:.1 \
> -a:2 -f:s32_le,1,22050 -i amb2.wav -ea:.1 -erc:1,2 \
> -a:3 -f:s32_le,1,22050 -i amb3.wav -ea:100 -erc:1,3 \
> -a:4 -f:s32_le,1,22050 -i amb4.wav -ea:.01 -erc:1,4 \
> -a:1,2,3,4 -f:s32_le,4,22050 -el:surroundEncoder, \
> -f:16,2,22050 -o temp.wav
>
> Something like that should help you, I think. I haven't tested it, but
> that should at least get you close.

I tried that, but to make sure I just tried it again. Same result as
all the other variations I've tried. The result is a .wav file with
the minumum possible value, -32768, for all data in both channels.
Thank you for the suggestion.

>
> You may already know, but just to be sure, the -ea: parameter is a
> percentage. So -ea:100 means no change to volume. < 100 decreases
> volume, > 100 increases volume. Your -ea:.1 and -ea:.01 will be very
> very quiet. Also, the mix routine in ecasound is such that when mixing n
...
Right. I'm not trying to make a real sound, right now. Just trying
to get the processing to work. Without success.

Greg


New Message Reply About this list Date view Thread view Subject view Author view Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Fri May 28 2004 - 15:21:10 EEST