Re: [ecasound] -t: at 48000

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

Subject: Re: [ecasound] -t: at 48000
From: Kai Vehmanen (k_AT_eca.cx)
Date: Thu May 29 2003 - 19:41:40 EEST

Next message: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] -erc effect causes delay"
Previous message: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] Forward: Bug#195027: ecasound2.2: Processing time (option -t) wrong with sample-rate != 44100 Hz"
In reply to: Jeremy Hall: "-t: at 48000"
Reply: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] -t: at 48000"

On Tue, 13 May 2003, Jeremy Hall wrote:

> my aio-objects were at 48 instead of 44.1. ecasound stopped short and I'm
> wondering if it is because it didn't use the right rate when computing
> frames_per_second for the -t parameter.

This bug should be fixed now in CVS (see my previous msg). Let me know if
this is not the case.

-- 
 http://www.eca.cx
 Audio software for Linux!

Next message: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] -erc effect causes delay"
Previous message: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] Forward: Bug#195027: ecasound2.2: Processing time (option -t) wrong with sample-rate != 44100 Hz"
In reply to: Jeremy Hall: "-t: at 48000"
Reply: Kai Vehmanen: "Re: [ecasound] -t: at 48000"

New Message	Reply	About this list	Date view	Thread view	Subject view	Author view	Other groups

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b28 : Thu May 29 2003 - 19:42:42 EEST